Torture victims often seem nameless and faceless But behind every victim, there is an individual, a fami1y, a Community and a world being affected by torture |
Over five weeks ago, I stood in Lafayette Park, along other with other survivors
of torture in Guatemala, along with others whose lives had been torn apart by the
violence there. The tulips were only clips of leaves, patches like open hands.
Together, we called for truth: who was responsible for our life-shattering losses?
Who was involved in the hundreds of thousands or disappearances and
assassinations carried out by the Guatemalan death squads over the past three
decades? What was the role of our Own government in these atrocities? We
asked, not out of idle curiosity, but because only by learning the truth can we heal
and only by learning the truth can we prevent these terrible realities from
recurring.
In the five weeks of my silent vigil, during two of which I have fasted, I have
lost twenty five pounds. I have suffered the wind, and the cold, and the rain. But
that is nothing. In Guatemala, approximately ten people have been tortured since
the tulips budded and bloomed. Around thirty more hove been murdered for
Political reasons.
The United Nations mission in Guatemala has found that that vast majority of
these abuses are committed by forces connected to the state, and the impunity
these murderers and torturers enjoy is the main obstacle to human rights. The
people or Guatemala want peace. They want to reconstruct their society,
prosecute the abusers, break the cycle or impunity that allows the violations to
continue. So, once again, I call on the United States government to declassify all
Information related to human rights abuses in Guatemala, from 1954 to the
present. Allow the Guatemalan people to heal.
Our Government has taken the first step In the necessary declassification of
files on Guatemala. Last Friday, the State Department released several thousand
pages of documents. Those given to me are disappointing. I have asked
repeatedly for information on the American present at my torture, whom my
torturers referred to as their boss. I have always believed if I could identify
Alejandro, I could also learn who my Guatemalan torturers were. On April 4, First
Lady Hillary Clinton told me that any information related to Alejandro, even
classified information, would be released to me. She did not rule out the
possibility that Alejandro was a present or past employee of a US agency.
The documents I have received, however, do not reveal the identity or
Alejandro nor shed any light on the Identities of my Guatemalan torturers. What
the documents do reveal is a pronounced bias against me from the very
beginning, on the of the US embassy in Guatemala.
As most of you know, on November 2, 1989, I was abducted from the back
yard of a religious retreat and taken to a clandestine prison, where I was
interrogated, tortured, and brutally raped. At one point my torturers told me that I
not cooperate, they would have to turn a videotape they had of me over to
Alejandro, their Boss, and he would release the tape to the public and the press.
The tape showed me engaged in an act I was ashamed of, an act I was forced to
commit. I have finally spoken publicly about this: I was forced to stab another
woman whom the torturers had taken prisoner.
Several hours later, I came face to face with Alejandro, the boss. As my
torturers were beginning to rape again, I became aware of the presence of
someone else in the room. - a man had cursed in unmistakable, American
English. Then, in broken, heavily accented Spanish, he shouted that I was a North
American nun and that my disappearance had become public. He ordered my
torturers to stop. He took off my blindfold, which I had been forced to wear at
various points in the torture, and helped me on with my clothes. I asked him
directly, in English, if he were an American. He refused to answer but put me into
a jeep and told me he was taking me to a friend at the American embassy who
would help me leave the country.
For the duration of the trip, I spoke to him in
English, which he understood perfectly. In his broken Spanish, he told me he was
working to liberate the Guatemalans from communism. He added I should forgive
my torturers. He said my torturers had confused me with Veronica Ortiz
Hernandez, a member or the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity. I
reminded him that the death threats I had received were addressed to me. There
was no mistake involved. Alejandro then told me in English -- perfect American
English -- to remember that he had access to the videotape and the photographs
that been made of me.
Since I did not trust Alejandro and did not know where he was really taking
me, I jumped out of the jeep when it was stopped in heavy traffic. I made my way,
eventually, to the Maryknoll house and then was taken to the Papal Nunclo for
safety. The US Ambassador and another embassy official arrived and wanted to
speak with me, but I refused to be alone them, and I was too traumatized to talk to
them about my experience. They seemed to accept this, They were told about the
cigarette burns on my back, which the Archbishop and others had examined and
they could see the bruise and abrasion on the left side of my face where my
torturers had hit me.
As I have recently learned from the State Department documents, however,
the Ambassador did not patiently and impartially await my testimony. He did not
ever intend to undertake a serious, impartial investigation. I left almost
immediately for the United States, and within a week of my abduction and escape,
before any serious Investigation had been conducted and before I had submitted
any formal testimony, Ambassador Stroock had drawn his conclusions about
what he referred to as my "alleged disappearance and subsequent reappearance:
In other words, according to Ambassador Strook, I was never abducted, but
with the help of US priests and nuns and the Guatemalan Archbishop, I simulated
an abduction as a political strategy to end US funding of the Guatemalan military.
The insinuations on the part of US embassy officials continued, no matter how
illogical or contradictory. In a report to the Secretary of State, Ambassador
Stroock says, "Human rights is a legitimate topic for discussion, a mainstream
political issue. The topic is no longer the exclusive preserve of communists. It is
now OK to be for human rights." But in a report to the Secretary of State dated
April 1992, Stroock describes part of a visit I had made to Guatemala to testify
court:
"Her press conference, while undoubtedly high on drama and very
moving to most of those personally present and many television
viewers, was patently political. Sister Diana read in Spanish from a
prepared statement which was later published in a full-page ad in the
newspaper. Unlike in her previous declarations, which were confined to
what happened to her, this statement was a political manifesto in which
she said she is pursuing her case on behalf of all victims of torture and
injustice in Guatemala.
I was willing to return to Guatemala four times to testify in the Guatemalan
courts. To give you an idea of the ambiance the courtroom, in 1992 the presiding
Judge told US embassy officials, "When there was a question she did not know
how answer (such as how many bodies ware in the pit into which you were
thrown?) she broke down and cried, and then requested recess during which
time she went into the bathroom with her therapist. Upon returning to the
courtroom, Ortiz provided answer." This. according to the Judge, was an
example of how I was parroting information given to me by others.
The same month, embassy official Sue Patterson remarks,
One of our crosses to bear here in Guatemala is the Sr. Dianna Ortiz
case. (It's a] big political problem for the Government of Guatemala
because everybody believes a nun more than they do the Government
of Guatemala, On this case, however, I don't, nor does anyone else who
knows the case well -- too many inconsistencies in her accounts. .. . I
write this informally because we have to be so very careful in this case
in order not to be accused of being partial or disbelieving.
The fact is, I have been consistent in my account since the beginning. The US
embassy was inconsistent and, in fact, deceptive, paying lip service to the need
to find the truth in my case and secretly undercutting me, slandering me, and
trying to prevent the truth from emerging.
Stroock,who from the beginning had expressed concern about "the potential
damage to US interests resulting from this ~ incident," wrote several letters to the
State Department In 1990, arguing that my request to meet with the State
Department desk officer to explain the sequence or events and answer questions
should be denied: "If the department meets her," he writes, "pressure from all
sorts of people and groups will build on the department to act on the information
the provides... I am afraid we are going to get cooked on this one...."
The documents released to me by the State Department reveal that the US
embassy never investigated the possibility that an American with a contact in the
embassy was present at my torture. Instead, an embassy officials engaged in
intimidation. The day I escaped, an embassy official told a nun at the Maryknoll
house that such a charge would damage the credibility of my story. In a March
1990 meeting with my lawyers, Ambassador Stroock said the statement that an
American with ties to the embassy was present at my torture was "an insult to
every mission employee." In a letter to my lawyer, he accused me of breaking the
eighth commandment: bearing false witness against my neighbor.
The enraged attitude of Embassy officials, their immediate unwillingness to
investigate seriously, and their slanderous characterizations of me as a liar, a
political strategist, or -- according to a congressional aide who conversed with
embassy official Lew Anselem at a cocktail party in December 1990 - a lesbian
involved in a lover's quarrel, suggest that there. was indeed something about my
abduction and torture that the embassy wanted to hide.
Of all the documents I received from the State Depart. only one, dated 1990,
contains a significant reference to Alejandro. It reads as follows: "VERY
IMPORTANT: We need to close the loop on the issue of the 'North American'
named by Ortiz as being involved in the case. The EMBASSY IS VERY SENSITIVE
ON THIS ISSUE, but it is an issue we will have to respond to publicly....." Two
completely redacted (blacked out) pages follow.
I can only hope that full declassification of documents belonging to other
agencies, such as the Pentagon, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the
Central Intelligence Agency, will reveal more than the State Department's
disclosure has.
Numerous US congressional representatives have assured me of their
commitment to pressuring for a full, agency-wide declassification of the files on
Guatemala. Last Thursday representatives Porter and Lantos presented me with
a letter to President Clinton, asking for the declassification of all US government
information on human rights cases in Guatemala since 1954. It was signed by 103
members of Congress, including Representative Nancy Pelosi, Representative
Connie Morella Representative Lynn Woolsey, Representative Robert Torricelli.
and Representative Xavier Bercerra.
I cannot adequately express my gratitude for their promise to assist the
victims and survivors of human rights abuses in discovering the truth. The
hundreds of thousands of people in Guatemala who have lost loved ones to
torture and murder, who are struggling to recover from heinous forms of torture,
and who are desperately trying to prosecute human rights violators need this
information. Justice is the only measure that will end the decades of torture,
murder, and repression in Guatemala,
Given the assurance that members of Congress will vigorously take up the
struggle for declassification, I will now suspend my fast and my vigil. I want to
thank all the people who sat with me through the hot days and cold nights in this
park in front of the White House. I would like to thank all the people throughout
the country who conducted fasts and vigils in solidarity with the request for
declassification of documents on Guatemala. I especially want to thank those
who stood on the White House sidewalk, singing hymns and reading Scripture,
then allowing themselves to be arrested one by one as a testament to that
solidarity and to the seriousness of our request. Over a hundred people were
arrested last week for civil disobedience in front of the White House, including
Bishop Thomas Gumbleton., of Detroit, Dan Ellsburg. and Phillip Berrigan.
The struggle for truth and Justice in Guatemala needs to be taken up by all of
us, on all fronts. Because I need and demand the truth, for myself arid for the
people of Guatemala, today I am filing a law suit against the United States
agencies to which I submitted requests for documents over a year ago. (My lawer
Michele Arrington, will speak more about this.)
I am leaving the park, but my vigil continues. I hope the candle I lit on March
31, which has burned day and night in the park as a reminder to President Clinton
of the hundreds or thousands of us who have suffered in Guatemala, now burns
within you. We must all ask together, Who is Alejandro?
That question has gone for so long unanswered. But I always hope. By
chance I met, when I appeared on the Today Show, forensic artist Jean Boylan.
She offered to help me, and the past four days I have had the opportunity to work
with her to produce these four sketches. I would like to unveil the three
Guatemalan torturers first. .
This is Alejandro, the man whom my torturers referred their boss- -the man
who gave explicit orders to my torturers, the man who had access to a
clandestine prison in Guatemala: the Escuela Politecnica, or Old Military School,
in Guatemala City.
This is Alejandro. He is not a figment of my imagination, he is real
I am presenting these sketches to the Intelligence Oversight Board and the
Department of Justice to assist them in their investigation. But I'm also seeking
help from people throughout the world. If you have any information about these
men, please contact Michele Arrington, at 202-383-6722 or Pat Davis, at the
Guatemala Human Rights Commission/USA (202-529-6599). I want to ask all of
YOU for your help, for myself and for the people Guatemala -- for the innocent
students, church workers, journalists, human rights advocates, and others
typically targeted for disappearance, torture, and murder because they work for
truth and justice In a society characterized by inequality and oppression. I
believe that together, we can bring the torture to an end.
"Her refusal to speak to US government representatives, either here
or in the US and the insistence by those around her on maximum
publicity via press releases and phone conversations with
congressional staff and religious groups in the US leads us to question
the 'motives and timing behind the story: apparently a debate is
scheduled in Congress this week on aid to Guatemala."
For more information on -how to assist Dianna and the people of Guatemala in their search for truth, please call Guatemala Human Rights Commission/USA
(202) 529-6599; FAX (202) 526-4611
3321 12tb Street, NE - Washington, DC 20017
email: ghrc@igc.apc.org